Blog Archives

Sl vs libtard

 

libtard

By Mb50

libtard

(Lib-Tard) 1) Combination of the words Liberal and retard (see also: Libterd, libturd, libnerd, libsurd, libdiot, libored) 2) The result when a tree hugger successfully mates with a tree and the offspring is born with an extra chromosome. 3) Any helpless society that must always be liberated by the blood and sweat of others yet are too arrogant and stupid to realize that they owe their entire existance to others.(see also: French-tard, French-Tarded, Retarded-Frenchmen).

libtard
1) Hillary clinton and her husband, you know what’s his face. You know that libtard that got impeached for going down on that fat chick in the beret that looked like Rosie Odonnel.
2) Look at that tall mongoloid with the vote Kerry T-shirt. Must be one of them libtards.
3) Screw you Frenchie! You freakin’ Libtard.

#truth #life #true-ness #cornhole #lockjaw #systematic polar realism

I am publishing this “RANT” for my friend SL  and her answer to libtards. I’s more than 140 characters so I felt it was better to publish it here so I could tweet it to the world; and thus re-tweet accordingly.

by SL 

Here’s my rant:

I’ve just asked you to give me the specific examples of hate crimes committed on people from the right to people on the left.

Give me the actual crimes and not just what you’re hearing in the news

I want to hear about actual hate crimes.  Give me a list.

And don’t tell me that some kid in school called somebody a name. According to the rule of law, calling somebody a name in school it’s not a hate crime. If it is, then please cite the rule of law that made that a crime. And show me where our free-speech ends and hate crime begins. (by the way, I’m not condoning the behavior of kids bullying one another or anyone making anyone else feel uncomfortable.)

You are being manipulated by the media!

You need to look at the facts!

I’m tired of the left-wing media having such a double standard and creating such division in our world.

The media is not holding the left accountable.

And they are not holding the left to the same standard as they are the right.

If saying mean things is considered a hate crime then look at all of the mean things the left has been saying to the right???

The entire right has been bashed this entire campaign and labeled a racist, sexist, bigoted, Islam a phobic, anti-Semite, Xena phobia, misogynist, deplorable, irredeemable, un-American etc. etc.!!  And it’s not even true for the majority of people!

I am feeling threatened! I am feeling fearful! I’m suffering! I can’t walk out in public with A make America great hat or a Trump shirt or a bumper sticker on my car for fear that I will be assaulted or my property would be vandalized!!!

I can’t drive down the freeway in LA for fear that rioters are going to block my way and attack me and my vehicle!!  I’m in fear for my life. People are beating and killing Trump supporters!  People are burning down their houses!!!  People are destroying their property!!

Why are you not concerned about MY fear????
Why are you not concerned about MY life????
Why are you not concerned about MY rights????
Why are you not concerned about the hate crimes being committed against me????

I will not on tolerate this unfair behavior!  My fears and my concerns are just as important as an illegal immigrants if not more so!!

I am an American citizen!!!  This is my country! I have lived and worked here and pay taxes here and so have my parents!

My rights should not come after a noncitizen’s rights!

People have choices to obey the rules of law! And many LEGAL immigrants are angry that illegal immigrants are cheating them! LEGAL immigrants are citizens, illegal immigrants are not. That is not racist that is the rule of law and that is a fact!

When you choose to disobey the rule of law, you accept the consequences of that choice!

NO hate crime is acceptable!  NO CRIME is acceptable. And that includes the crime of coming into this country illegally!

Go Get E’m SL

Obama’s New Nationalism

image

by Conn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer

Today, in Osawatomie, Kansas, President Obama will invoke Teddy Roosevelt as a model for his 2012 reelection campaign. Over 100 years ago, after leaving the White House, Roosevelt delivered a seminal speech, titled “The New Nationalism,” which would become the foundation for the Progressive Party he would later create to challenge President Taft’s reelection. Obama plans to identify with those same progressive roots today as he calls for higher taxes on the rich and more government control of the economy.

At the White House press briefing yesterday, spokesman Jay Carney said Obama, “Thinks it’s an opportune time and an opportune location to try to put into broader perspective the kind of debates we’ve been having and the issues that are of vital importance to give middle-class Americans the kind of fair shot that they deserve.” Obama will no doubt echo Roosevelt’s call for a “equality of opportunity” and recycle the speech’s “square deal” rhetoric.

But while there are many parts of Roosevelt’s New Nationalism speech that will sound great to modern ears, there are also many passages that will grate on independent voters:

Combinations in industry are the result of an imperative economic law which cannot be repealed by political legislation. The effort at prohibiting all combination has substantially failed. The way out lies, not in attempting to prevent such combinations, but in completely controlling them in the interest of the public welfare.

This, I know, implies a policy of a far more active governmental interference with social and economic conditions in this country than we have yet had, but I think we have got to face the fact that such an increase in governmental control is now necessary.

These words are as radical today as they were 100 years ago. When text of Roosevelt’s New Nationalism reached New York, The New York Times called it “Roosevelt’s Super-Socialism.” Don’t count on that paper using a similar description of Obama’s speech today.

Source

Enhanced by Zemanta
%d bloggers like this: